Chemicals distribution: traceability from supplier to delivery
Raw materials and chemicals: we guide you through a representative scenario, tracing batches from supplier to warehouse to delivery, with linked documents.
Representative scenarios built on our method and our direct experience in the sectors described. They do not refer to a specific identifiable client: names, quotes and any figures are illustrative. We will publish cases with real clients — with explicit consent — as they become available.
Scenario results
Lot traceability
Before
Reconstructed by hand on request
After
From receipt to delivery, per lot
Orders and confirmations
Before
Phone and scattered e-mails
After
One order flow with tracked confirmations
Shipping documents
Before
Prepared by hand for every shipment
After
Generated by the flow, with datasheets linked to the item
Stock levels
Before
Reliable only after stocktaking
After
Real-time, per warehouse and per lot
Context
Distributing raw materials and chemicals isn't moving boxes: it's moving lots with an identity — safety datasheets, expiry dates, storage and transport constraints, clients who ask for an account of every step. When the supply chain calls about a recall or an audit, "which supplier did the lot delivered to X come from?" is a question you must answer in minutes, not days.
This scenario draws on experience the Gitogi team lived from the inside: the typical processes of a distributor in the sector, not a single real client.
The challenge
1. Traceability was detective work. Lots came in and went out, but the supplier → warehouse → client thread had to be reconstructed by hand across documents. Possible, but slow — and slowness, facing a recall, is risk.
2. Orders lived in three channels. Phone, e-mail, the odd client portal. Each channel with its own confirmations, misunderstandings and "but I said". The sales office was a permanent translator between channels and warehouse.
3. Documents were prepared from scratch every time. Transport documents and attachments for every shipment demanded manual care — and the right safety datasheet, in the right revision, had to be there every time.
4. Stock levels were discovered at stocktaking. Between promised sales and actual availability there was a grey zone that produced either missed sales or promises to chase.
The approach
Here too, the process first: mapping the order-to-delivery flow with sales, warehouse and logistics together — because one person's problem was almost always the symptom of someone else's process.
Then, by degrees:
- One order flow: whatever the entry channel, the order lives in one place, with status and confirmations visible to sales and warehouse alike.
- The lot as a first-class citizen: receipt, location, picking and delivery logged per lot — traceability stops being an investigation and becomes a query.
- Documents generated by the flow: the transport document is born from the shipment, with attachments linked to the item — the correct revision, every time.
- Real-time stock per warehouse and per lot, so sales promises rest on true availability.
What changed
The difference is measured in the questions answered in minutes: where is the lot? what can I promise? what left, and with which documents? When the answers live in the process — not in people's memory — the business scales without multiplying office work.
How we approach it today
This experience is why warehouse, purchasing and sales are processes we treat with particular respect. To see how we set them up with an integrated ERP:
Does your distribution business have the same symptoms? Let's talk — 30 minutes, no strings attached.
Declared limitations
Transparency is part of our method. Here's what this scenario doesn't prove.
- Specific metrics depend on context: in a real engagement they are set against the client's baseline and goals and discussed in a follow-up call. Those shown here are illustrative.
- The longest part of the work isn't the software: it's cleaning the item master data and the historical lot records. Underestimate it and you digitalize the mess.
- Sector-specific constraints (safety datasheets, dangerous-goods transport) remain the responsibility of the designated company roles: the ERP supports them, it doesn't replace them.
Want similar results for your company?
In 30 minutes, we'll discuss how your business works and whether the AIRA method fits your needs.